Next JS vs React: Which Framework to Use in 2024?

Next JS vs React: Which Framework to Use in 2024?

Choosing the right framework is crucial for building robust and efficient web applications. Among the myriad of options available, Next.js and React.js stand out as two popular choices. While both are JavaScript frameworks, they serve different purposes and offer unique features.

In this article, we'll delve into the distinctions between Next.js and React.js, examining their strengths, and weaknesses, and ultimately helping you decide which one suits your project requirements better.

What is Next.js?

Next.js is a React-based open-source web framework created by Vercel. It is designed to build production-ready web applications with ease. Next.js provides features like server-side rendering (SSR), static site generation (SSG), automatic code splitting, and seamless client-side navigation.

Its built-in routing system simplifies the process of creating dynamic pages and handling data fetching. With its strong emphasis on performance and developer experience, Next.js has gained significant popularity among developers for building modern web applications.

What is React?

React.js, often simply referred to as React, is a JavaScript library developed by Facebook for building user interfaces. It follows a component-based architecture, allowing developers to create reusable UI components that can be composed to build complex interfaces efficiently.

React focuses solely on the view layer of an application, providing a declarative and efficient way to design interactive UIs. It has a vibrant ecosystem with a vast collection of libraries and tools, making it a versatile choice for front-end development.

Difference Between React and Next.js

While both Next.js and React.js are JavaScript frameworks used for building web applications, they serve different purposes and cater to distinct use cases. The primary differences between the two lie in their capabilities and features:

1. Server-side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)

Next.js offers built-in support for SSR and SSG, allowing developers to generate HTML pages dynamically on the server or at build time. This results in faster page loads and improved SEO performance compared to traditional client-side rendering. React, on the other hand, primarily focuses on client-side rendering, although SSR can be achieved using third-party solutions or libraries like Next.js.

2. Routing

Next.js provides a powerful routing system out of the box, enabling developers to create dynamic routes effortlessly. React, however, does not include a routing solution by default but can be integrated with third-party libraries like React Router for handling client-side routing.

3. File-based Routing

Next.js adopts a file-based routing approach, where each page is represented by a separate file in the project directory. This makes organizing and navigating between pages intuitive and straightforward. React, on the contrary, requires developers to set up routing manually, which can be more cumbersome for larger applications.

4. API Routes

Next.js includes built-in API routes, allowing developers to create serverless API endpoints within the same project. This simplifies the process of integrating backend functionality into Next.js applications. React, being a view library, does not provide built-in support for backend API handling and requires integration with server-side technologies separately.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Next.js and React

Advantages of Next.js

1. Built-in SSR and SSG

Next.js offers seamless server-side rendering and static site generation, improving performance and SEO.

2. File-Based Routing

A simplified routing system based on file structure enhances project organization and navigation.

3. API Routes

Integrated support for creating serverless API endpoints within the same project streamlines backend development.

Disadvantages of Next.js

1. Learning Curve

Next.js introduces additional concepts like SSR and SSG, which may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.

2. Complexity

Advanced features like SSR and API routes may add complexity to the development process, especially for simple applications.

Advantages of React

1. Component-Based Architecture

React's component-based approach promotes reusability and modularity, enhancing code maintainability and scalability.

2. Vibrant Ecosystem

An extensive library of third-party packages and tools for various use cases provides flexibility and customization options.

3. Community Support

A large and active community of developers contributing to React's ecosystem ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and support resources.

Disadvantages of React

1. No Built-in SSR or SSG

React does not natively support server-side rendering or static site generation, requiring additional setup or third-party solutions.

2. Routing Complexity

A lack of built-in routing solutions may lead to added complexity, especially for larger applications requiring complex routing logic.

Which is Best: Next.js or React.js?

The choice between Next.js and React.js ultimately depends on the specific requirements and goals of your project. Here are some scenarios where each framework shines.

Choose Next.js If:

Choose React.js If:


Both Next.js and React.js are powerful frameworks for building modern web applications, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. By carefully evaluating your project requirements and considering the features and capabilities of each framework, you can make an informed decision to choose the one that best suits your needs. Whether you prioritize performance, developer experience, or flexibility, both Next.js and React.js offer robust solutions for building high-quality web applications.

Tell us what you want and we’ll find you what you need.
Preferred team size

1 - 5